Relevance and importance
The case for benchmarking is compelling.
All businesses have the potential to streamline processes, improve
performance, increase sales and reduce costs. Benchmarking your
own operations against other successful businesses and introducing
their best practice into your own business can help achieve this
potential. Most business processes are common throughout industry.
For SMEs, successful benchmarking can provide:
 |
A wake up call. |
 |
Help to make a case for change. |
 |
Practical ideas from others who have already undertaken change
to help achieve change. |
 |
The impetus and buy-in to find new ways to do things. |
 |
The opportunity for staff to learn new skills. |
It can also result in significant tangible benefits:
 |
Step changes in performance and innovation |
 |
·Improving quality and productivity |
 |
Improving performance |
In the private sector, benchmarking is a successful commercial
activity to seek innovation outside the industry paradigm and get
ahead of the competition. It is recognised as a valuable tool for
learning and is therefore of increasing interest.
In Europe, benchmarking is being used to measure the competitiveness
of the European economy as a whole and the European Commission is
spearheading among others an Enterprise Benchmarking programme focusing
on improving the internal environment and aims to encourage the
take-up of benchmarking among SMEs.
Overview
There is not a standard benchmarking process. In practice, individual
organisations will customise accepted models to suit their own circumstances
but should embrace the following stages:
 |
Planning / setting objectives. |
 |
Collecting information. |
 |
Analysing the findings. |
 |
Agreeing and implementing recommendations. |
 |
Monitoring and reviewing the benchmarking process
and results of the set objectives. |
 |
Recording lessons learned. |
Top
Recommendations and practical tips
Regardless of type and scope of benchmarking, the following tips
will improve success rate:
 |
Objectives clearly defined at outset. |
 |
Scope of work suits objectives. |
 |
Support of senior managers. |
 |
Sufficient resources, skills and guidelines to
undertake and complete proposed benchmarking. |
 |
Clear understanding of own organisations performance
markers being compared with those of other organisations. |
 |
Agree with comparators to abide by an approved
benchmarking code to avoid confidentiality issues - see the
European
Benchmarking Code of Conduct:. |
 |
Realistic expectations of what improvements can
be achieved following benchmarking recommendations. |
Top
Warnings and potential pitfalls
Avoid:
 |
Benchmarking for the sake of it. |
 |
Focusing only on comparing performance measures
without considering the activities which will help achieve good
practice. |
 |
Expecting benchmarking will be quick and easy. |
 |
Spending too long on the research part of the
process at the expense of gaining support for subsequent recommendations. |
 |
Asking for information from comparators without
being willing to share - especially if the information is sensitive. |
 |
Failing to implement recommendations. |
Top
|