Knowledge Centre home
Introduction
 
Establish aims for collaboration
Understand market needs
Identify alternative approaches
Develop working relationships
Develop the proposition
Assemble bids
Manage projects
Apply benchmarks
Adopt cost effective innovation processes
Co-innovation
Manage risk
Consider legal aspects
Sell and deliver added value soft skills
 
List of stories
 
Full contents
 
Further resources
 
Close Knowledge Centre
(to return to Work Room)

Develop the proposition

Apply benchmarks

Relevance & importance Overview Recommendations & practical tips Warnings

There are numerous definitions of benchmarking but essentially it involves making comparisons and learning from them.

In the business context, it's a highly respected activity to help improve business processes by identifying, understanding and adapting best practice and high performance from other organisations.

In the context of 'Developing the proposition', benchmarking might begin with a simple competitor analysis to establish:

  • Who's the best?
  • How good are they?
  • How do we get that good?

 

 


Relevance and importance

The case for benchmarking is compelling.

All businesses have the potential to streamline processes, improve performance, increase sales and reduce costs. Benchmarking your own operations against other successful businesses and introducing their best practice into your own business can help achieve this potential. Most business processes are common throughout industry.

For SMEs, successful benchmarking can provide:

A wake up call.
Help to make a case for change.
Practical ideas from others who have already undertaken change to help achieve change.
The impetus and buy-in to find new ways to do things.
The opportunity for staff to learn new skills.

It can also result in significant tangible benefits:

Step changes in performance and innovation
·Improving quality and productivity
Improving performance

In the private sector, benchmarking is a successful commercial activity to seek innovation outside the industry paradigm and get ahead of the competition. It is recognised as a valuable tool for learning and is therefore of increasing interest.

In Europe, benchmarking is being used to measure the competitiveness of the European economy as a whole and the European Commission is spearheading among others an Enterprise Benchmarking programme focusing on improving the internal environment and aims to encourage the take-up of benchmarking among SMEs.


Overview

There is not a standard benchmarking process. In practice, individual organisations will customise accepted models to suit their own circumstances but should embrace the following stages:

Planning / setting objectives.
Collecting information.
Analysing the findings.
Agreeing and implementing recommendations.
Monitoring and reviewing the benchmarking process and results of the set objectives.
Recording lessons learned.

Top


Recommendations and practical tips

Regardless of type and scope of benchmarking, the following tips will improve success rate:

Objectives clearly defined at outset.
Scope of work suits objectives.
Support of senior managers.
Sufficient resources, skills and guidelines to undertake and complete proposed benchmarking.
Clear understanding of own organisations performance markers being compared with those of other organisations.
Agree with comparators to abide by an approved benchmarking code to avoid confidentiality issues - see the European Benchmarking Code of Conduct:.
Realistic expectations of what improvements can be achieved following benchmarking recommendations.

Top


Warnings and potential pitfalls

Avoid:
Benchmarking for the sake of it.
Focusing only on comparing performance measures without considering the activities which will help achieve good practice.
Expecting benchmarking will be quick and easy.
Spending too long on the research part of the process at the expense of gaining support for subsequent recommendations.
Asking for information from comparators without being willing to share - especially if the information is sensitive.
Failing to implement recommendations.

 

Top